Wiggling Sums

An interesting Traversable problem I stumbled across
Published on October 17, 2012 under the tag haskell

The problem

The context of this problem is related to optimization problems: given some value, we want to produce a bunch of related values.

An example of where such an operation can be found is shrink :: Arbitrary a => a -> [a], found in the QuickCheck library.

Alex and I encountered an fun problem while working on something similar at Tsuru. This blogpost is not really aimed at people who have just begun reading about Haskell as it contains little text and requires some intuition about sums and products (in the more general sense).

{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
import Control.Applicative
import Data.Traversable

We can capture our idea of related values in a typeclass:

class Wiggle a where
    wiggle :: a -> [a]

And define a simple instance for Int or Double:

instance Wiggle Int where
    wiggle x = [x - 1, x, x + 1]
instance Wiggle Double where
    wiggle x = let eps = 0.03 in [x - eps, x, x + eps]

The interesting notion is to define instances for more general (combined) types. Given a tuple, we can wiggle it in two ways: either wiggle one of its components, or wiggle them both. Let’s express both notions using two simple newtypes 1:

newtype Product a = Product {unProduct :: a}
    deriving (Show)
instance (Wiggle a, Wiggle b) => Wiggle (Product (a, b)) where
    wiggle (Product (x, y)) =
        [Product (x', y') | x' <- wiggle x, y' <- wiggle y]
newtype Sum a = Sum {unSum :: a}
    deriving (Show)
instance (Wiggle a, Wiggle b) => Wiggle (Sum (a, b)) where
    wiggle (Sum (x, y)) =
        [Sum (x', y) | x' <- wiggle x] ++
        [Sum (x, y') | y' <- wiggle y]

The same applies to structures such as lists. We can wiggle all elements of a list, or just a single one (if the list is non-empty). Both instances are reasonably straightforward to write.

The interesting question is if and how we can do it for a more general family of structures than lists? Foldable? Traversable?

A Wiggle instance for traversable products is not that hard:

instance (Traversable t, Wiggle a) => Wiggle (Product (t a)) where
    wiggle (Product xs) = map Product $ traverse wiggle xs

But how about the instance:

instance (Traversable t, Wiggle a) => Wiggle (Sum (t a)) where
    wiggle = wiggleSum

The solution

Is it possible? Can you come up with a nicer solution than we have?

  1. These newtypes are also defined in Data.Monoid. I defined them again here to avoid confusion: this code does not use the Monoid instance in any way.↩︎